Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Sharing Knowledge on Disaster Risk Reduction in the Himalayan Region:

0 comments
Affiliation

ICIMOD

Date
Summary

From the Abstract:


"This report is the last in a series of publications prepared under the project ‘Living with Risk - Sharing Knowledge on Disaster Preparedness in the Himalayan Region’, implemented by [International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development] ICIMOD during 2006 and 2007 and funded mainly by the European Commission through their Humanitarian Aid department (DG ECHO) as part of the Disaster Preparedness ECHO programme (DIPECHO) in South Asia. The book (published on-line only) documents the results of two workshops - one early in the project which looked at the status of disaster preparedness planning in the region, and one at the end of the project which looked at social inclusion in disaster preparedness plans. It provides a short background to the project and workshops, a synthesis of the major findings and recommendations, and details of the proceedings."

The 53-page report states that because "[t]he impact of a disaster is influenced by the community’s vulnerability to the [natural] hazard, [v]ulnerable and marginalised people - e.g., women, elders, the poor, the disabled, and Dalits (‘low caste’) - are more affected than others. Hence, disaster risk reduction is of great importance from the perspective of development and poverty alleviation....The focus [of responding to disasters] has thereby gradually shifted towards ‘disaster risk reduction’, meaning the broad development and application of policies, strategies, and practices to minimise vulnerability and risk of disaster throughout society by avoiding (prevention) or limiting (mitigation and preparedness) the adverse impacts of hazards."

On the national level in Bangladesh, Nepal, India, and Pakistan, National Disaster Management Plans are being established along with national institutions for their implementation. However, as stated here, linkages between poverty, gender, and the environment are often missing. "There is also a lack of provision for coordination mechanisms. Sharing Knowledge on disaster risk reduction in the Himalayan Region between different stakeholders and the absolutely necessary focus on community empowerment is often inadequate....There has been a lack of decentralisation and devolution of power and resources to the local government level to implement local plans. Government officials and politicians are still, to a great extent, in the relief and response mode; however, as indicated, a paradigm shift is currently occurring, and the region will witness great changes in the near future."


The document points out that discrimination and social exclusion occurring in the cultural environment also occur in disaster relief in some of the following ways: "The burden on women has increased and they face more exploitation and violence and as a result women have faced more trauma and distress. Children have suffered serious disruption in critical stages of development and have become vulnerable to trafficking and exploitation. Separation and experiences of death of their parents have created traumatic conditions and bases for long term mental health problems. The disabled have not been given due priority and sometimes have even been left out during evacuation operations. Early warning systems are not disability friendly. Relief workers are generally insensitive to the needs of the disabled. The majority of short- and long-term shelters - including latrines, health care, food and water services - have not been accessible for disabled people." The document calls for extensive sensitisation and capacity building at the community level to address these inequities, while still for accounting for local knowledge, practices, and contexts. It recommends "build[ing] project acceptance, ownership, mutual trust, and sustainability."


Local versus state management is also discussed, including the recommendation to find "innovative forms of governance...required to address the complexities and uncertainties associated with [globalisation processes]" and to [b]uild...upon local knowledge and practices that capitalise on local strengths whenever relevant [in order to] decrease dependencies on external aid".

Source

ICIMOD Bimonthly eNewsletter, February/March 2008, Issue: 22.