Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Why media ownership matters to children

1 comment
Summary

The Federal Communications Commission is reviewing a number of long-standing regulations governing ownership of newspapers, radio and televisions stations. Among them is the rule barring a single company from owning several types of media outlets - a TV station and a newspaper, for example - in a single market.


The commissioners have said they will decide on any rule changes by spring 2003. The issue is whether the rules are still appropriate in a market altered by the growth of the internet, cable and satellite television. Media companies say the regulations are outdated and make it hard for them to compete. Critics are worried that looser rules couldresult in a few huge companies controlling the vast majority of news, information and entertainment.


Open Letter to the FCC

by Natasha Kirtchuk, [age] 11



Last week at Columbia Law School, the public got a chance to tell several FCC commissioners what they thought about who should own the media.


They said I was too young to speak at the hearing. On behalf of kids in this country, this is what I would have said:


If only a few companies own the local TV and radio stations and newspapers in each city, kids won't be exposed to the diversity of ideas that we need to grow into good citizens.


It's important for kids to have different ways to look at a situation. When someone tells us what they think, we won't know enough to form our own opinions. How are we going to know that speaking out is okay?


Interesting TV and radio gives kids something to chew on. Adults want to limit the amount of violence on TV because it may give kids the wrong idea. Fine. But also understand that we get good ideas from things we like and if what we hear or see in the media doesn't challenge us to think outside of the box-we are not going get those good ideas.


Everyone thinks that kids just watch and watch and watch TV. Well, maybe we do talk about it a lot but it's something we all do. In the media, we can see different ways that kids can be-and adults can be-and it helps us learn.


Kids like seeing kids on TV because on TV they have a special place in society. We see the kids on TV and they are accessible to us. We can see kids being important and, for once, we see people actually listening to them. They make being a kid important because that's their job. In real life, we don't have jobs or a place in society. It's because we can't vote but that's another topic...


I'm lucky; I live in New York City where there is a lot of diversity. But for kids who live in places where everybody looks like them, the only way they get access to different types of people and different viewpoints is on TV.


As a young journalist, I can say that kids won't be interested in becoming media makers if they feel that they don't have a chance to get their work aired.


We will lose faith in the news if what we read in the newspaper and see on TV all sounds the same. If we can't trust the news, we'll ignore it. And you wonder why young adults don't vote!


According to a study by Children Now, kids make up 26 percent of the country. But only 10 percent of news stories talk about kids-and when they do we are either criminals or victims. What are the chances deregulating will make these numbers better?


It's hard enough getting the mainstream press to run stories about kids - like the young Africans who spoke out to their leaders at the United Nations Special Session on Children. Or why children oppose a war in Iraq. Or the challenges of being young and dealing with mental illness.


As it is, children don't have a voice in the mainstream media. How can the commissioners with kids - all former kids - not consider our voices when making this decision?


Companies get airways for free as long as they do something good for the public, right? If they are not giving us balanced information or entertainment from a bunch of media makers, then they shouldn't get to keep the airways.


Deregulating the media without seriously considering how it will affect kids is saying that the government doesn't care about us. The FCC is controlling our future and limiting our right to ideas.


I'm saying all this because I think you can make the right decision. We are 26 percent of this country and we are more than just the future. We are the present.

Source

Connect for Kids site; posted by Chris Scheupp on the Yahoo Groups Youthful Media List server on January 29, 2003.

Comments

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/17/2006 - 07:29 Permalink

:applauses: