Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

How obvious can you be? Heavy-handed messages in EE material

0 comments

Author

Affiliation
University of Southern California, USA
Summary

According to Mayer, health and social change communication materials, including Entertainment Education (EE) examples, are often designed so that the message and story are clear-cut and easy to understand. This is based on the assumption that the clearer the message, the greater its impact. As a result, these messages often feel quite heavy-handed and obvious. She asks, "Is this approach in fact the most effective one?" Mayer states that there has been a great deal of research indicating that social change is engendered by the conversation that the media promotes. It is her contention that when material is too simplistic and blatant, it invites very little of this crucial conversation, while material that is more evocative and open-ended may keep the audience more emotionally involved and thus promote subsequent behaviour-change conversation. This paper looks at available research and debates the pros and cons of clear and obvious messaging versus more open-ended and ambiguous materials.