Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
9 minutes
Read so far

ChangeNet: The Lessons from Obama's campaign for International Development Democracy and Governance Policy and Action

11 comments
Image
Your Blog

 

President-elect Obama and his team have demonstrated an extraordinary ability to foment and support change. Much of that change relates to the practice of democracy and governance which is also such an important global development priority. Of course the major change challenges of a global economic melt-down, climate change, poverty, global security, relations between peoples of different faiths, and other vital issues now await an Obama Administration. But we should all reflect on what we can learn from their democracy and governance change process to date.

 

 

 

12 months ago, over a long dinner, a group of UK Labour Party Members of Parliament told me categorically that there was no chance of the USA electing a Black President. Many of us from outside the USA have watched with eyes wide open and jaws gaping as we witnessed the election of this Black President. That in itself is extraordinary. But in many ways the other achievements have been equally impressive: the vastly increased political engagement of previously disenfranchised, disillusioned, or disinterested populations such as many parts of the Black and Latino communities and young people across the country; and the extraordinary escalation of informed and astute public debate and private dialogue on substantive political and social issues.

 

 

 

If we are to achieve international progress on democracy and governance, the realisation of similar phenomena is essential. Achieving those democracy and governance dynamics has proved very elusive.

 

 

 

So, whilst the rest of the world is probably focused on WHAT President Obama will do I suggest that local, national, and international development policy makers focus on HOW he did it. We are all in the change process and the Obama team has certainly demonstrated how to achieve change. What can we learn?

 

 

One informed commentator [I think it was Roland Martin on CNN] put it this way:

 

 

Obama married community organising to the Internet!

 

 

And that does encapsulate his approach.

 

 

Strikingly, the very first thing that President-elect Obama did on being elected was to send an email. Before he made his Grant Park acceptance speech in Chicago he sent an email to the 3 million people in their network. This was instant, non-mediated communication and it will have produced instant and unfiltered feedback. It is the new technology version of a street corner chat - that essential component of community organising.

 

 

The "network" is an essential part of any community organising process. President-elect Obama and his team were able to communicate with 3 million people instantly because they had taken the time to focus on, build, grow, nurture, and engage a broad network of people.

 

 

Good community organising requires two way [perhaps more accurately multi-way] communication processes. No community organiser would be effective if they simply said "line up behind me - follow me - here we go". The Obama team made extensive use of the new digital social networking tools in order to re-create this two-way process on a major scale.

 

 

All of us who are trying to achieve something - community organisers included - are very well aware that if style does not trump substance it is certainly its equal. How you approach a task is as important as what you do. The Obama team continually stressed what "we" can do, highlighted the importance of "everyone's contribution" recognised diversity and difference [it's the first time I have heard an American President say 'gay' in a positive tone, for example]; and highlighted that they could not "do this alone". Their extensive use of the two-way and community-oriented digital technologies not only reinforced this tone but facilitated real, substantive action in the same tone for an enhanced American democratic process.

 

 

You will get nowhere as a community organiser if there are not places and spaces where people can meet, talk, debate, and decide. This is a vital part, not just of community organising of course, but of any democratic process. The Obama team knew this and they very effectively utilised the new social networking technologies in order to implement this principle both within their campaign organisation and in the way they related to the American electorate. It was a vital component, for example, of their engagement of the youth population in the USA - a population that demands almost as a right that they are engaged, not talked to!

 

 

These are just some of the ways that community organising has been married to the internet for very substantive advances in USA Democracy and Governance.

 

 

What seems to stop the development and pursuit, at significant scale and with commensurate resourcing, of democracy and governance policies and strategies of a similar ilk to the Obama approach?

 

In order for this to happen there would need to be a distinct policy decision to move to a more balanced policy and strategy process. Good judges, solid legislation, fair policing, improved leadership, better political journalism, strengthened political parties, and unbiased election monitoring remain very important, of course. But they have little meaning in the absence of expanded political engagement across communities and broader and more informed political dialogue in more public and private spaces. These elements need to be a much more central focus in international development policies. The Obama team strategy gives us some clues about the way forward. 

 

 

We also need some young people to, if not lead, then be key players in this policy and strategy process. I am far too old for this to be an appeal to self interest. There is little doubt that young people understand the nature and potential of the new technologies in ways that those of us who are not of this youth generation can neither understand nor appreciate. Consequently, when faced with digital processes we retreat to the safe, secure, and understood. The opportunity is lost. It is no coincidence that so many in Obama's team were so young.

 

 

That is my assessment of the  lessons to be learned from the Obama campaign for more effective local, national, and international development action to progress democracy and governance. What is your assessment? Please reply below. 

 

 

Thanks - Warren

Comments

Submitted by cmorry on Wed, 11/05/2008 - 18:00 Permalink


It seems clear that while the Obama campaign was built on many approaches some traditional to US politics for generations and others that have been evolving at least since Move-on this will be the first time a successful presidential candidate owes as much to a decentralized online movement of activists and their action as he does to the many volunteers who will have toiled away at campaign offices as they have for generations. But the online networks are significantly different from the kinds of volunteers politicians have depended on in the past. Traditionally a candidate thanks the volunteers, closes the offices and everyone goes home until called upon next campaign. The online communities that have been built around Obama's campaign for fundraising, activism, volunteer recruitment and the like have come to expect more and have gotten involved because they feel they are participating in a movement to change the US in fundamental ways. As Warren pointed out the first thing Obama did after winning was to send these people an email. This network cannot be rolled up and reignited in 4 years - this is not the way online social networks work nor would it be the best use of a huge resource for connecting with a large segment of the US population and more importantly engaging people in a political process that has become distant to the average citizen to put it mildly. However, this is new territory for a President and one with as much potential to go terribly wrong for him as it has to reinvigorate participation in democratic processes and generate new forms of political engagement.

How Obama relates to this network may be as important to how he governs as how he relates with the Senate and Congress.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 11/05/2008 - 18:26 Permalink


It is interesting that Obama brought in one of the founders of facebook to lead his online networking. The engagement of so many in a process that inspired while also leaving them free to interpret the politics, policies and priorities of the campaign within their own reality and using a campaign web site together with facebook, twitter etc. This will create a lot of impetus to keep things going beyond the election. Many groups that have formed around an issue or region will monitor what he does as president and want to be part of an ongoing process that does not end as Obama himself said with the election.

Possibly a nightmare for the traditionalists who feel controlling the message is essential but a new day for those who see an opening to a new form of democratic engagement. A lot changed with this election perhaps in ways we haven't yet fully digested...

Submitted by jlevy on Thu, 11/06/2008 - 09:12 Permalink


Point well made on Obama's use of communication technology. A further example: a neighbour and his Blackberry volunteered on election day in the former red state of NH. His job was to enter and send to the local Dem headquarters numerical data representing the names of those who had voted in his precinct as they exited the polling location. They were then removed from the phone list of get-out-the-vote calling that was being done there by other volunteers at the headquarters. Voila, NH turned blue.

And just to further set the record straight, our former VT governor, Howard Dean, now chair of the Democrats, is, without a doubt, the father of internet use in campaigning.


I certainly agree that Obama used interactive technologies to engage people in ways that were never before possible. This definitely played a role in mobilising youth - even those not old enough to vote, like my friend's 8-year-old son whose teacher used new technologies as well as "old school" classroom activities, to organise mock elections, etc. (See also the article "Kids Speak out on Election in iReport Videos" - http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/16/kids.election.irpt/index.html?er…). However, I was certainly impacted by the volunteer who knocked on my porch door, the phone call asking if Obama could count on my vote, and the college students holding Obama signs and waving at the only stoplight in town as cars honked and waved. My mom, who (like McCain) is not a computer user, was just as adamant Obama supporter as I. So I do think that - while the international community may draw on some rich lessons from this campaign - the picture is quite complex, which only gives hope to those trying to reach people in places where new technologies do not yet have a stronghold.

User Image
Submitted by dheimann (not verified) on Fri, 11/07/2008 - 05:22 Permalink


Though I think that there were many other elements contributing to Obama's success (his grace, his intelligence, smart advisors, Howard Dean's National Democratic Party strategies, the destruction(s) of the past 8 years), I agree with your assessment of the lessons to be learned related to new technologies and community development within his campaign. Fundamental change occured in the United States of America on Tuesday, November 4 2008. However, that change wasn't just because of Obama's campaign - it's been a long time coming. I am hopeful that Obama will be able to move forward with the changes he spoke of in his campaign, but that will require new strategies, perhaps, and different lessons. Aren't the lessons you refer to here specific to an election campaign, and not to governance, in general? Effective governance - will that be possible through creative use of the new technologies and a focus on community organising strategies?

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/07/2008 - 06:35 Permalink


Though social networking may have contributed enormously to the election and reinvigorated the US democratic process for the moment, like the digital divide we often notice, there is still the dilemma of bringing in the voices of the marginalised. My neighbourhood experience with those still on dial-up vs. those with highspeed, here in a comparative rural paradise of equality, has heightened my awareness of the subtlety of disenfranchisement, especially now, when it surfaces most noticeably in US politics. While we are admiring Obama's marriage of community organising to the internet, there is still room for amplifying voices of those who feel they need to paint "maverick" on their chests to be noticed and heard, because they may not contribute to a digital conversation. Siobhan Warrington in "Celebrating the Uncelebrated" http://www.comminit.com/en/node/279229 and other contributions on oral testimony captures the need to be active in seeking out those who are not part of the majority anymore.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 13:55 Permalink


Once in 12-15 years tired people in the society have a vital need for change, using that needs politicals like Obama can come to power. Be aware...

Artem

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/03/2009 - 14:07 Permalink


In fairness, Howard Dean, in the 2002-3 camapaign used the web far ahead of the curve.

He had blogs and alerts and forums (fora). They actually had a bunch of very innovative SW writers incl. one college student who did an effort to "let good ideas Bubble up" from the larger community, for attention of the campaign. This sounds like running the campaign by polls, but it's not. Polls ask pre determined questions, Dean for America used the online discussions to distill the insights - things the campaign did NOT think of, but might want to think on.

Sounds like something we should be doing, hmm?

Fred Fleming

f11501@verizon.net

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/28/2009 - 04:04 Permalink

Very interesting post as a community nurse I often think about this thing called community and the need to communicate with individuals and groups. I've started to reflect on some aspects of 'poverty' across four domains of knowledge: intra-interpersonal, social, sciences and political. I may add to the first two posts having read your text Warren. Don't be too quick to wright(?) yourself off - the older generations (and yes that 's' there is important) still have a major role to distilling and disseminating values whilst keeping themselves active and well.
Many thanks
Peter Jones
Lancashire
UK
--
http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
Hodges Health Career - Care Domains - Model
http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/
h2cm: help 2C more - help 2 listen - help 2 care
http://twitter.com/h2cm