Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Example Message 4: Legislation and Regulation

0 comments

Though everyone would prefer commonsense and goodwill to prevail more often than not laws and regulations are needed. This applies to disinformation, the role and conduct of internet companies, social media practices and the strnegthening of independent media. Though they should be argued for, developed and used judiciously. There can be signifcant downsides on crucially important communicaiton and media requirements such as freedom of information and expression if the laws and regulations get it wrong.  

The UNESCO and ITU report: Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation While Respecting Freedom of Expression (summary here) has a focus on broadband, elections, accurate information and freedom of expression. There is a summary of this aspect of the report at this link: Legislative Responses - From the Report: Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation While Respecting Freedom of Expression

Key recommendations from that part of the report; ones that we will all need to consider and work through in each of our contexts include:

1. Conform responses to disinformation with international human rights standards ...

2. Develop independent oversight and evaluation ...

3. Focus on internet communication companies' practices ...

4. Avoid criminalising disinformation ...

5. Avoid internet shutdowns and social media restrictions ...

6. Ensure that any legislation is necessary, proportionate, and time-limited ...

7. Support investment in strengthening independent media ...

Legislative Responses - From the Report: Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation While Respecting Freedom of Expression

We would very much welcome you sharing through this thread, in support of the work of others and as a contribution to expanding and strengthening work related to digital, elections and freedom of expression:

  1. Any experiences you have had in seeking to act along the lines outlined above in the four recommendations just stated.
  2. Any questions you may have about how best to put these recommendations into action.
  3. Any observations/analysis that you may have about the strengths or limitations of these recommendations.
  4. Any proposals you may have for better strategic actions.

Many thanks for engaging and sharing.

As a further contribution to this hugely important theme below please find some relevant experiences shared on the Communication Initiative platform:

The Inherent Danger of Hate Speech Legislation - A Case Study from Rwanda and Kenya on the Failure of a Preventative Measure

Freedom of Expression and Media Regulation - A Media Legislation Manual

26 Recommendations on Content Governance: A Guide for Lawmakers, Regulators, and Company Policy Makers

Media Viability: Tackling Big Tech

Road to 2030: Access to Information in the Driver's Seat

We look forward to your contributions. With much strength for your vitally important work.

Guy