Inequalities In Knowledge Of HIV/AIDS Prevention
Summary
From the Abstract
This note presents a summary overview of information about socio-economic andgender inequalities in knowledge of HIV/AIDS prevention, produced by a series of country studies undertaken by the World Bank's thematic group on health, nutrition, population and poverty. The studies provide information, based on analysis of household data collected by the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) program, concerning poor-rich coverage and gender differences for twenty-three countries, primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America and the Caribbean.
The principal general findings are:
- Knowledge of HIV/AIDS prevention is distinctly higher among the better-offthan among the disadvantaged in almost every country with available data. On average, the 80+% knowledge rate in the wealthiest quintile is on the order of 60% or 20-25 percentage points above the 55-60% among the lowest quintile.
- The poor-rich differences just noted are distinctly smaller, and knowledgeamong the poor is distinctly higher in Sub-Saharan Africa than in Latin America. Among the countries in each region, the average knowledge rate is approximately the same (around 70%). So is the knowledge rate in the wealthiest quintile (just over 80%). But the knowledge rate among the poorest quintile averages 60-65% in the Sub-Saharan African countries, 50-55% in the Latin American/Caribbean countries.
- Distinct gender differences in HIV/AIDS prevention also exist in mostcountries, with knowledge among men averaging around 75%, compared with anaverage of roughly 65% among women.
- If knowledge about HIV/AIDS prevention is seen as an ultimate outcome ofcommunication and education programs and compared with comparable data for other types of health program, the record of HIV/AIDS prevention knowledge efforts look relatively favorable. That is, while the levels of HIV/AIDS prevention knowledge among the disadvantaged, and disparities between the disadvantaged and the better-off are considerably larger than one might wish, they are not nearly so low among the disadvantaged, or so biased against them, than the achievement indicators for most other types of program.
Click here to download this 12-page paper in PDF format [52 KB].
- Log in to post comments











































