Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
3 minutes
Read so far

Understanding the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences, Peer-Violence Perpetration, and Gender Norms Among Very Young Adolescents in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study

0 comments
Affiliation

Johns Hopkins University (Ramaiya, Heise, Blum, Moreau); Universitas Gadjah Mada (Choiriyyah); The Prevention Collaborative (Heise, Levtov); Population Council (Pulerwitz); University of California San Diego (Lundgren); Institute of Women and Ethnic Studies (Richardson); Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health - CESP (Moreau)

Date
Summary

"Although unequal gender norms increase peer-violence perpetration among boys, they do not mediate/moderate the relationship between adversity and peer-violence perpetration."

Violence is not only driven by individual factors but is embedded in sociocultural influences that span from the immediate environment to broader societal forces. Norms valuing male toughness and authority have been well documented in relation to gender-based violence in adult populations but have not been thoroughly investigated in relation to other forms of violence. This study assesses the role of gender norms on the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and peer-violence perpetration among very young adolescents (VYAs) in three communities in Indonesia (Semarang, Denpasar, and Bandar Lampung), where data suggest that prevalence of violence perpetration ranges from 3.4% to 85%.

The baseline survey was conducted between August and October 2018 among 2,974 10- to 14-year-old participants (boys: 44.79%, girls: 55.21%) in schools serving low-income populations. Variables included:

  • The dependent variable was peer-violence perpetration based on two questions: (i) During the last 6 months, have you bullied or threatened another boy or girl for any reason? and (ii) During the last 6 months, have you slapped, hit or otherwise physically hurt another boy or girl in a way they did not want?
  • The main independent variable, ACE, was based on a 13-item measure including items about fear of physical abuse, fear of emotional abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, violence victimisation, parental substance abuse, parental emotional distress, domestic violence, parental incarceration, and household instability.
  • The study included two measures of gender norm perceptions: the sexual double standard (SDS) scale (a 6-item scale) measuring the perception boys are rewarded for romantic relationship engagement, whereas girls are stigmatised or disadvantaged for the experience; and the gender stereotypical trait (GST) scale (a 7-item scale) measuring young people's perceptions of differential traits portraying boys as tough and girls as weak.

Less than one in five adolescents reported no history of ACE, while almost one-third were exposed to four or more ACE. Boys were more likely to report any ACE exposure (84.01% vs. 79.84% for girls) and to be victims of four or more ACEs (38.74% reported four or more ACEs vs. 28.14% of girls). Overall, 17.52% of the participants stated they had perpetrated peer-violence in the last 6 months, with boys more likely to engage in this behaviour than girls (24.17% vs. 12.12%; p = .001).

Adolescents who reported no exposure to ACE were more likely to hold gender-equal norms than peers who sustained childhood adversities. Thus, depending on the number of ACEs reported by boys, the proportion of boys scoring above the median (corresponding to more unequal norms) ranged from 47.42% to 61.82% on the SDS scale, and from 48.36% to 66.28% on the GST scale as the number of ACEs increased. Likewise, the proportion of girls scoring above the median (corresponding to more unequal views) ranged from 45.32% to 58.44% on the SDS scale, as the number of ACEs increased.

Gender norm perceptions did not moderate the relationship between ACE and peer-violence perpetration, but unequal perceptions of SDS were independently associated with peer-violence perpetration among boys but not girls (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.95). Other risk factors included lifetime tobacco use among boys and girls and lifetime alcohol use among boys. Protective factors included parental closeness among girls.

Thus, the results show that the boys in this study are significantly more exposed to childhood adversities than are girls, which may in part explain the sex differences that are seen in peer-violence perpetration. Consistent with studies linking hegemonic forms of masculinity to violence perpetration, the study found that more unequal perceptions of an SDS correlated with increased peer-violence perpetration for boys. The same was not true for stereotypical gender traits portraying boys as tough and girls as weak, which highlights the multifaceted nature of gender norm perceptions.

Reflecting on the findings, the researchers note that school bullying is normalised in Indonesia as, until recently, it was a tradition in many middle and high schools to initiate the freshmen class with a week of hazing. "The need to assert power and gain affiliation within peer network and the school climate that condones bullying might be the more relevant influences than gender unequal attitudes on peer-violence among adolescents."

Programmatic implications include the need to support young people who face adversities at a young age, to consider gender-transformative interventions that challenge notions of hypermasculinity, and to provide trauma-informed care to address the specific psychological and social needs of adolescents who face adversities. "Programs targeting ACE and gender norms which engage boys, girls, and families are more likely to be successful in reducing peer-violence perpetration and promoting gender equitable norms."

Source

Journal of Adolescent Health, Volume 69, Issue 1, Supplement, July 2021, Pages S56-S63; and email from Astha Ramaiya to The Communication Initiative on July 8 2021. Image credit: Adam Cohn via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)